Thursday, January 21, 2010

Are many white people possibly "SCHIZOPHRENIC..??

What kind of people do you know of ,who could espouse such a strong belief in the "Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights",could do so much in opposition to these documents,in regard to thier fellow Citizens.Citizens who want their rights instantenously and want others to recieve their "Civil Rights" incrementally, to me are"SCHIZOPHRENIC".What say Ye..??

Definition of "Schizophrenic"..should I say, a definition.

ed schultz,shut up and sit the hell down(open letter)

who in hell made you an expert on a damn thing?You just came on the political scene a few years ago and as far as I know you have not won one damn office for anything,not even dog catcher. Now you are giving advice to the President of the United States..?? Who the hell do you think you are anyway? You ran the President down on "your" little shows,then you get angry with him because people don't take his advice? Have you ever thought you could be the reason for people's doubt? Your big mouth caused this health care bill to fail..!!! Yes you and pundicrats like you,who know nothing but their own arrogance.Here's some advice for you Mr Ed the talking Ass...SHUT THE HELL UP..!!!

Seems like you used to be a republikkkon big eddie,are you really on their side..??

"white pundicrats" comment on President Obama's supposed arrogance

Don't you just love the way,"white pundicrats" look to each other for validation of President Obama's supposed arrogance.These characters never seem to have the most remote idea that they have never been President,but somehow seem to have the most in depth concept of the qualities of a President.

I wonder if it might be more appropriate for them to, at least suggest that "their observations" are this or that, but not these very "modest" all knowing "white pundicrats" they actually make definitive statements.

They nod and ask each other the very same questions,not even once realizing that their experiences are all from the same fundamental backgrounds,those of primarily elitist and protected status situations.Amazing isn't it how being "white and a pundicrat" allows you to make the most astute observations in regard to the "arrogance" of the first President of African decent who has, for the most part led the U.S.A. from the brink of economic disaster.

Now that the country has forgotten where the U.S.A. was merely a year ago,these "white pundits" use their echo chamber to suggest that we the public doesn't need to hear where we were, when this man was elected President.Now they embrace the "republikkkon" party,the very party that just stood there and watched,if not participated,in the ravaging of the U.S.A.'s economy over the last 8 years.Do you think that perhaps these "white pundicrats" feel that if the public was diverted from remembering just what kind of shape this economy was in,a mere year ago,they("white pundicrats") will be absolved for their pathetic votes and reporting of the news.

The "white pundicrats" by no means ,I assume,could ever be, GOD forbid, accused of being "arrogant". How could there even be the most distant realization of arrogance, when you only have "white pundicrats" mimicking each other on every screen on television and every station on the radio.You might be persuaded to think that only "white pundicrats" have the most legitimate answers for everything. But surely that wouldn't lead one to suspect "arrogance" in the ranks of the "white pundicrats".

So,while pondering the "arrogance" of our President Barack Obama,as determined by the league of "white pundicrats",take a minute that maybe,just maybe, the "white punditracy" the "corporate media" echo chamber,might have their own little "arrogant" tendencies.

But that's just an observation from an angry black man who speaks with a somewhat "Negro dialect".

Stay tuned...much more to come..!!!

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

republikkkons and the sorry corporate media

How do you feel about the sorry corporate media? Do you think the media really represents accurate reporting or do you think the sorry corporate media is too involved in punditrocracy? By "punditrocracy" I mean the idea that rather than report news and information,the "mighty media show hosts" are more involved in their intrepertation of current events.My opinion is that the media has gone too far by using their exposure to attempt to be the public brain.
Corporations,including large media corporations,take the public's expectation of hearing actual reporting for granted and employ semi slick front people,called "show hosts" to be their mouth pieces.This is a little bit more than my personal assumption.There are creditable news sources that have done research to substantiate their observations of corporate media selective reporting and biased observations by "mighty media show hosts".

I found proof of my suspicions,regarding corporate "media show hosts", in a great article in Consortium.When you read this article, maybe you might find some reason to employ more scrutiny when you happen to see or hear these corporate media "show hosts".These members of the corporate media "punditocracy" are found on networks such as cnn,cnbc,msnbc,cbs,abc,nbc,fox noise etc..I would not like to leave out radio media either.
May I ,at this point,introduce a very fine source of information, that could very well provide you with a different perspective, other than complete trust in "corporate media" and it's "punditrocracy".

Please have a look at this and if you feel so inspired,offer your observations.I would very much like to know if this effects you as much as it did me.

I sincerely hope that you will find this information informative and possibly provacative. Again,your comments either positive or negative are encouraged. Thank you.